Tuesday nightâs âWheel of Fortuneâ episode has social media followers shouting about the showâs âdumbest moment ever.â
The frustrating episode featured three contestants taking 8 turns and 10 attempts to solve the puzzle:Â âAnother feather _n yo_r _a_â
While the correct answer was simply âAnother feather in your cap,â the players took several tries to get there â and it left viewers very frustrated.
Game player Laura Machado had three guesses to win as host Pat Sajak and legendary letter-tuner Vanna White looked on. However, Machadoâs wrong answers included: âAnother feather in your hat,â âAnother feather in your lapâ and âAnother feather in your map.âÂ
Meanwhile, fellow contestant Christopher Coleman didnât guess any of the correct letters and landed on Bankrupt when he twirled TVâs most infamous wheel.
Thomas Lipscomb also scored a Bankrupt and Lose a Turn for his first two times in the hot seat. But on his third try, he guessed âCâ and correctly solved the phrase.
Twitter had LOTS of thoughts. Not nice ones.
But in a Twitter thread Wednesday, host Pat Sajak came to the defense of the players. He suggested he âknew in real time what was happeningâ during the âincredibleâ episode.
He wrote, âThe first attempted solve was âFeather in your hatâ which, by the way, is how a lot of people say it. So all three players thought it was a good solve, and were stunned when I said it was wrong.
âNow imagine youâre on national TV, and youâre suddenly thrown a curve and you begin getting worried about looking stupid, and if the feather isnât in your hat, where the heck can it be? You start flailing away looking for alternatives rather than synonyms for âhat'."
Sajak alluded to contestantsâ seeming embarrassment once the puzzle answer was revealed, suggesting theyâd âwant to crawl in a hole,â and saying that he felt it was his role to avoid chastising the players.
He said, âTruth is, all I want to do is help to get them through it and convince them that those things happen even to very bright people".
Sajak continued, âBut mocking them online and calling them names? These are good people in a bad situation under a kind of stress that you canât begin to appreciate from the comfort of your couch. Good-natured laughter is one thing. Heck, they laughed at themselves. But, hey, cut them some slack. Unless youâre there, you have no idea how different it is in the studio.â
He also suggested that while he may âhave fun withâ and âteaseâ players on occasion, things can â and do â âgo wrong.â
âI feel for them, and I try to salve the wounds on camera and off. So, yeah, it was an oddly entertaining puzzle and itâs okay to laugh at the situation. But have a little heart..."
Sajak then closed his rant with a word of warning:Â âAfter all, you may be there one day. And no one wants to be trending on Twitter.â
Source: NY Post.
Photo Credit: David Livingston/Getty Images.